<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EricBroze.com &#187; Eric Broze</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ericbroze.com/author/admin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ericbroze.com</link>
	<description>A digital version of me...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:18:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Navy and Ratheon losing the technology battle despite new laser tests</title>
		<link>http://ericbroze.com/2010/u-s-navy-and-ratheon-losing-the-technology-battle-despite-new-laser-tests-2/</link>
		<comments>http://ericbroze.com/2010/u-s-navy-and-ratheon-losing-the-technology-battle-despite-new-laser-tests-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Broze</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uss Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ericbroze.com/?p=1075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems all of the net is reporting on the U.S. Navy and Ratheon sucessfully using a laser guided Phalanx system to shoot down an unarmed drone. Cnet, Crunchgear and EEtimes have all picked up on the story and videos on the subject have been cropping up on all the usual sites. I, for one, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems all of the net is reporting on the U.S. Navy and Ratheon sucessfully using a laser guided Phalanx system to shoot down an unarmed drone. <a title="Lasers blast airborne drones in Raytheon-Navy test" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13772_3-20011143-52.html" target="_blank">Cnet</a>, <a title="New pics of U.S. Navy-Raytheon’s laser attack" href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2010/07/21/new-pics-of-u-s-navy-raytheons-laser-attack/" target="_blank">Crunchgear</a> and <a title="Lasers blast airborne drones in Raytheon-Navy test" href="http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4204828/Lasers-blast-airborne-drones-in-Raytheon-Navy-test" target="_blank">EEtimes</a> have all picked up on the story and videos on the subject have been cropping up on all the usual sites. I, for one, am not impressed.</p>
<p><strong>U.S. Navy Laser Weapon Shoots Down Drone in Test.</strong><br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rTpP412fM8U&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rTpP412fM8U&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>After careful research, it appears we are ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE behind in development when compared to the Japanese. Their Wave Gun technologies have been threatening the United States since the 1980&#8242;s when then President Ronald Regan proposed &#8216;Star Wars&#8217; program in order to compete on these new battlefields.</p>
<p><strong> The Wave Motion Gun &#8211;  threat from outer space.</strong></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ty-1zWsXFNs&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ty-1zWsXFNs&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>The latest tests from this Japanese Battleship Yamato clearly demonstrates how outgunned the U.S. Navy really is.</p>
<p><strong>SPACE BATTLESHIP</strong><br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YBu1cZm4Gqg&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YBu1cZm4Gqg&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>As we struggle to transform the USS Iowa into a museum, the Japanese are lauching battleships into space. How can we compete with that?</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://ericbroze.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ericbroze.com/2010/u-s-navy-and-ratheon-losing-the-technology-battle-despite-new-laser-tests-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USS Iowa grows support in San Pedro</title>
		<link>http://ericbroze.com/2010/uss-iowa-grows-support-in-san-pedro/</link>
		<comments>http://ericbroze.com/2010/uss-iowa-grows-support-in-san-pedro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Broze</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uss Iowa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ericbroze.com/?p=1063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Donna Littlejohn, San Pedro&#8217;s waterfront advisory panel agreed to the proposal to bring the USS Iowa BB-61  to the Port of Los Angeles as a floating museum, last week. Community members who attended (perhaps 70 or so), including several downtown business owners, expressed strong support for the idea. When those opposed were asked [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Donna Littlejohn, San Pedro&#8217;s waterfront advisory panel agreed to the proposal to bring the USS Iowa BB-61  to the Port of Los Angeles as a floating museum, last week.</p>
<blockquote><p>Community members who attended (perhaps 70 or so), including several downtown business owners, expressed strong support for the idea. When those opposed were asked to raise their hands, no one did.</p></blockquote>
<p>The actual recommendation is:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>RECOMMENDATION:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Whereas, the berthing of the USS Iowa Battleship in the Port of Los Angeles will serve as a community asset creating cultural, educational and historical benefits to San Pedro and surrounding communities; and</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Whereas, the Port of Los Angeles will benefit in the form of Berth Rental and proceeds from parking lot concessions; and</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Whereas, it will provide jobs and visitor revenue for local businesses including Hotels and Restaurants; and</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Whereas, there will be no cost or burden to the Port, community, or local government entities to bring the USS Iowa here, maintain it, or return it to the Navy in case it is not successful; and</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Whereas, it will not delay the implementation of the Waterfront plan or interfere with harbor navigation; and</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Whereas, it will provide the anchor for the Fire Boat Display, Maritime Museum and Lane Victory and create a &#8220;Historical Core&#8221; for visitor draw, therefore, be it</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Resolved, That the PCAC makes the following Recommendations:</strong></p>
<p><strong>1.) </strong><strong>That the Port of Los Angeles provide Berthing Space and adjoining space to build an accompanying Museum for the USS Iowa, and</strong></p>
<p><strong>2.) </strong><strong>The Board of Harbor Commissioners direct the Port of Los Angeles to provide said Berth and Museum Space for the USS Iowa.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">This is great news for the Battleship Iowa sailors who have waited and watched the sister ships New Jersey, Missouri and Wisconsin become museums and tourist attractions. Now we can only hope for final resolution.</span></strong></p>
<p><a title="uss iowa gains more community" href="http://www.insidesocal.com/southbay/2010/07/uss-iowa-gains-more-community.html" target="_blank">h/t </a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://ericbroze.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ericbroze.com/2010/uss-iowa-grows-support-in-san-pedro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tweets this week ending 2010-07-18</title>
		<link>http://ericbroze.com/2010/tweets-this-week-ending-2010-07-18/</link>
		<comments>http://ericbroze.com/2010/tweets-this-week-ending-2010-07-18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 03:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Broze</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tweets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ericbroze.com/2010/tweets-this-week-ending-2010-07-18/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well said. RT @jennifurret #TAM8 is pretty much like having a four day long skeptical orgasm. I cannot explain it in any other way # “We need to make books cool again. If you go home with somebody and they don’t have books, don’t fuck them.” &#8212; John Waters # Hey #tam8 tweeps, check out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="aktt_tweet_digest">
<li>Well said. RT @<a href="http://twitter.com/jennifurret" class="aktt_username">jennifurret</a> #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23TAM8" class="aktt_hashtag">TAM8</a> is pretty much like having a four day long skeptical orgasm. I cannot explain it in any other way <a href="http://twitter.com/ericbroze/statuses/18497561133" class="aktt_tweet_time">#</a></li>
<li>“We need to make books cool again. If you go home with somebody and they don’t have books, don’t fuck them.” &#8212; John Waters <a href="http://twitter.com/ericbroze/statuses/18528371728" class="aktt_tweet_time">#</a></li>
<li>Hey #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23tam8" class="aktt_hashtag">tam8</a> tweeps, check out <a href="http://bit.ly/bdwugY" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bdwugY</a>  to download 170+ photos from the event compliments of  <a href="http://bit.ly/a5WODA" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/a5WODA</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/ericbroze/statuses/18543792471" class="aktt_tweet_time">#</a></li>
<li>Hey Activision &#8211; Geek Hero and Guitar Star is not the same as Guitar Hero. Your DCMA does not apply but who is going to stop ya, right? <a href="http://twitter.com/ericbroze/statuses/18544938852" class="aktt_tweet_time">#</a></li>
<li>Wondering how long @<a href="http://twitter.com/badastronomer" class="aktt_username">badastronomer</a> has been a fan of Wheaton&#039;s Law. #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23tam8" class="aktt_hashtag">tam8</a> @<a href="http://twitter.com/wilw" class="aktt_username">wilw</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/ericbroze/statuses/18545911478" class="aktt_tweet_time">#</a></li>
<li>What effect would taxing churches have on the economy? I&#039;m tired of these leeches to the system. Anyone have numbers? <a href="http://twitter.com/ericbroze/statuses/18561135544" class="aktt_tweet_time">#</a></li>
<li>Love you but it&#039;s more annoying than Ken Ham and Carrot top&#039;s love child RT @<a href="http://twitter.com/pennjillette" class="aktt_username">pennjillette</a> I&#039;m going bugnutty with the BugleMe thangs. <a href="http://twitter.com/ericbroze/statuses/18561392222" class="aktt_tweet_time">#</a></li>
<li>Aww. Thanks! RT @<a href="http://twitter.com/wilw" class="aktt_username">wilw</a> Hey, person who follows me on Twitter for some reason: I hope you&#039;re having an awesome weekend! <a href="http://twitter.com/ericbroze/statuses/18784456848" class="aktt_tweet_time">#</a></li>
<li>113 degrees in Vegas today. I guess I&#039;ll have to stay home and play videogames with a bucket of ice cream. <a href="http://twitter.com/ericbroze/statuses/18849037416" class="aktt_tweet_time">#</a></li>
<li>Bayonetta has hot witches in glasses which fight angels to a J-Pop sountrack with plenty of crotch and boob shots. #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23win" class="aktt_hashtag">win</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/ericbroze/statuses/18861836957" class="aktt_tweet_time">#</a></li>
</ul>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://ericbroze.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ericbroze.com/2010/tweets-this-week-ending-2010-07-18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
